Sherry Moore, founder and Principal Investigator, works where behavioral health, human–machine teaming, and human–AI alignment meet: long-duration spaceflight, its analogs, and the offshore and industrial crews facing the same problem with a smaller denominator.
A decade of creative and commercial practice brings a perceptual discipline to a domain usually left to engineers: the measurable signal between a person and the adaptive systems they work alongside.
The industry builds systems to extract, predict, and manage. Aether begins at the other end: the person stays the subject and custodian of their own model. Interpretation is co-calibrated, permission is ongoing, and the architecture starts from how a person actually engages.
Four lines of research. One architecture.
The instrument has already been run. Ten years of baseline; eighteen months of signal.
The baseline is not stationary. On one device, one behavior, skip rate fell from 74% to 45% to under 8% in three consecutive months — a regime change, not a slope.
The two channels agree at minute resolution. Listening covers 95% of the minutes inside writing windows, against 76% across the same days. p = 1.8 × 10⁻⁴.
And two hypotheses failed. Day-level coupling: null. Intraday convergence: null. Both are reported — a baseline you cannot falsify is not a baseline.
The subject is the principal investigator.
Identity-resolution systems connect fragmented observations to a person. Mission Chemistry asks what changing signals mean for that person and crew — and keeps the interpretation under participant control.
Aether is not asking to use a crew. It is offering to de-risk one. You bring the crew, the confinement, and the study funding. Aether brings the instrument, protocol, deployment, and analysis — and your crew keep custody of their own baselines. The prior is a decade deep and the instrument has already run live: the pilot validates rather than invents.